The diet that nutritionists most love to hate, the paleo diet, is an excellent weight-loss diet, and has no negative effects on the cardiovascular system. Australian researchers at Edith Cowan University came to this conclusion after doing a four-week study. But, the Australians point out, a paleo diet is deficient in calcium, iodine and vitamins B1 and B2. So paleo acolytes would probably do best to take supplements.
The researchers got a group of 22 women to follow a paleo diet for four weeks. The diet consisted of lean meat, fish, eggs, nuts, olive oil, coconut oil, fruit and vegetables. Grains, dairy, maize, potatoes and beans were forbidden. Another group of 17 women followed a diet that was compiled according to conventional nutritional guidelines.
Both groups were allowed to eat as much as they wanted. The women were healthy, not obese, but could do to lose a few kilograms of fat.
Although they could eat as much as they wanted, the women in the paleo group lost weight. So the paleo diet turned to be an excellent way of losing weight.
Most nutritionists fear that a paleo diet increases the chance of heart attacks and strokes. However, the researchers observed no increase in the paleo group in blood pressure, no worsening of cholesterol levels and no increase in inflammatory factors in the blood.
Thiamine (vitamin B1)
Adults need 1.1 mg thiamine daily. The paleo group did not get this amount, which is remarkable, given that the paleo diet contains important sources of this vitamin, such as meat and vegetables.
Riboflavin (vitamin B2)
Adult men require 1.5 mg riboflavin daily. The figure for women is 1.1 mg. The intake of this vitamin decreased in the paleo group, although not to dangerously low levels.
That there was a decrease is not surprising, as dairy products are an important source of vitamin B2.
The intake of vitamins A, C and E rose in the paleo group. In the other group the intake of these vitamins did not change.
In the paleo group the calcium intake halved. That’s logical, as dairy products are a good source of calcium. Nutritionists in wealthy countries say that adults require 1 g calcium daily. That is perhaps on the high side, say critical nutritionists: 600-800 mg calcium per day is enough. But the paleo group did not even consume this lower amount either.
The researchers wrote little about iodine, but we – the ignorant compilers of this free webzine – were shocked when we saw what the effect of the paleo diet was on iodine intake. Adults need 150 mcg iodine daily. The intake of the subjects in the paleo group (which was already low before the study started), halved.
The decrease is probably the result of eliminating bread and dairy from the diet. In Australia bread and dairy are important sources of iodine. [Prev Med. 2013 Jul;57(1):26-30.]
“In healthy females, the Paleolithic diet induced a more favourable effect on body composition over the short term intervention period”, the researchers summarised. “However, significant reductions in thiamin, riboflavin and calcium were noted.”
“We observed no significant differences between groups for cardiovascular and metabolic risk factors. Further, larger studies are recommended to assess the impact of the diets over a longer term period.”
Cardiovascular, Metabolic Effects and Dietary Composition of Ad-Libitum Paleolithic vs. Australian Guide to Healthy Eating Diets: A 4-Week Randomised Trial
(1) Background: The Paleolithic diet is popular in Australia, however, limited literature surrounds the dietary pattern. Our primary aim was to compare the Paleolithic diet with the Australian Guide to Healthy Eating (AGHE) in terms of anthropometric, metabolic and cardiovascular risk factors, with a secondary aim to examine the macro and micronutrient composition of both dietary patterns; (2) Methods: 39 healthy women (mean ± SD age 47 ± 13 years, BMI 27 ± 4 kg/m2) were randomised to either the Paleolithic (n = 22) or AGHE diet (n = 17) for four weeks. Three-day weighed food records, body composition and biochemistry data were collected pre and post intervention; (3) Results: Significantly greater weight loss occurred in the Paleolithic group (−1.99 kg, 95% CI −2.9, −1.0), p < 0.001). There were no differences in cardiovascular and metabolic markers between groups. The Paleolithic group had lower intakes of carbohydrate (−14.63% of energy (E), 95% CI −19.5, −9.7), sodium (−1055 mg/day, 95% CI −1593, −518), calcium (−292 mg/day 95% CI −486.0, −99.0) and iodine (−47.9 μg/day, 95% CI −79.2, −16.5) and higher intakes of fat (9.39% of E, 95% CI 3.7, 15.1) and β-carotene (6777 μg/day 95% CI 2144, 11410) (all p < 0.01); (4) Conclusions: The Paleolithic diet induced greater changes in body composition over the short-term intervention, however, larger studies are recommended to assess the impact of the Paleolithic vs. AGHE diets on metabolic and cardiovascular risk factors in healthy populations. Source: http://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/8/5/314