What’s the difference between dietary supplements, nutraceuticals and functional foods?
by Monica Mollica ~ trainergize.com
Dietary supplements are often confused with, or use synonymously with nutraceutials and/or functional foods. Here we get the terms right. The common denominator for dietary supplements, nutraceuticals and functional foods is that they all are products designed to supplement the human diet by increasing the intake of bioactive agents that are thought to enhance health and fitness 1. Other than that, each term describes a different product category. Before we go any further, it should be noted that these terms vary in meaning from country to country, as does the regulation of these agents 2-24.
In 1994 the US Congress enacted the Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act (DSHEA) 25. This act defines a dietary supplement as “a product (other than tobacco) that is intended to supplement the diet and that bears or contains one or more of the following dietary ingredients: a vitamin, a mineral, an herb or other botanical, an amino acid, a dietary substance for use by man to supplement the diet by increasing the total daily intake, or a concentrate, metabolite, constituent, extract or combinations of these ingredients.” Furthermore, a dietary supplement is intended for ingestion in pill, capsule, tablet, or liquid form; is not represented for use as a conventional food or as the sole item of a meal or diet; and is labeled as a dietary supplement 25.
The term “nutraceutical” was first coined 1991 by the by the Foundation for Innovation in Medicine 23. Since then, its definition has been modified. In 1999 a new working definition for nutraceuticals was proposed: Nutraceuticals are a type of dietary supplements that deliver a concentrated form of a biologically active component from a food, presented in a non-food matrix, to enhance health in dosages that exceed those that could be obtained from regular food 1. Some other definitions of nutraceuticals are “products that contain substances that are a natural component of foods, or other ingestible forms, that have been determined to be beneficial to the human body in preventing or treating one or more diseases, or improving physiological performance” 26, or “products isolated or purified from foods that is generally sold in medicinal forms not usually associated with food. A nutraceutical is demonstrated to have a physiological benefit or provide protection against chronic diseases” 27. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) does not recognize the term nutraceutical 1.
In regards to functional foods, all foods can be said to be “functional” in the sense that they provide us with essential nutrients, taste and aroma. However, foods are now being examined intensively for added physiologic benefits, which may reduce chronic disease risk or otherwise promote health 8, 13, 20-22, 24, 26, 28-32. These research efforts spurred the development of the growing food category now recognized as “functional foods”.
The concept of functional foods was first developed in Japan in the 1980s when, faced with escalating health care costs, the Ministry of Health and Welfare initiated a regulatory system to approve certain foods with documented health benefits in hopes of improving the health of the nation’s aging population 33. These foods are in Japan recognized as Foods for Specified Health Use (FOSHU) 15, 16, 34.
As of October 2004, 464 food products had been granted FOSHU status in Japan 24. In Europe and USA, the term “functional foods” is used instead of FOSHU 21, 24.
As a working definition, a food can be said to be functional if it contains a component (whether or not a nutrient) that benefits one or a limited number of functions in the body in a targeted way that is relevant to either the state of well-being and health or the reduction of the risk of a disease 35, or if it has a physiologic or psychologic effect beyond the traditional nutritional effect 11. At a consensus meeting in 1998, which was the last activity of a project supported by the European Union and coordinated by the International Life Science Institute Europe, a group of European experts adopted the following working definition: “a food can be regarded as functional if it is satisfactorily demonstrated to affect beneficially one or more target functions in the body, beyond adequate nutritional effects in a way which is relevant to either the state of well-being and health or the reduction of the risk of a disease”36.
Japan and some European countries, notably Sweden, are leading the development of functional foods, especially in the regulatory department. The development and marketing of functional food products in these countries is aided by specific regulations 15, 16, 24, 29, 33. Here food products that are eligible to be classified as functional foods bear a special seal so consumers can easily see that the specific food product has passed the rigorous premarketing scientific scrutiny, which is a necessary requirement 15, 16, 24, 29, 33.
In the United States, functional foods have no such regulatory identity. However, several organizations have proposed definitions for this new food category. In 1994, the National Academy of Sciences’ Food and Nutrition Board defined functional foods as “any modified food or food ingredient that may provide a health benefit beyond the traditional nutrients it contains” 37. The International Life Sciences Institute defines functional foods as “foods that, by virtue of the presence of physiologically-active components, provide a health benefit beyond basic nutrition” 38. In a 1999 position paper, the American Dietetic Association defined functional foods as foods that are “whole, fortified, enriched, or enhanced,” but more importantly, states that such foods must be consumed as “… part of a varied diet on a regular basis, at effective levels” for consumers to reap their potential health benefits 39.
You might also have heard the catchy terms “designer food”, “pharmafood” and “phytoceutical”…these names have met with varying degrees of acceptance, and are not used any more in scientific circles 40. Functional food products target healthy people and people in a preliminary stage of a disease or a borderline condition 24, 34. When the products are manufactured or distributed, approval from the government is required after rigorous evaluation of the safety and effectiveness of proposed specified health effects 24, 34. In contrast to functional foods, another category of foods called “medical foods” are classified for use in specific disease states and require a physician’s recommendation and continuous monitoring 2.
To recap, below is a summary list of the definitions for dietary supplements, nutraceuticals and functional foods:
A dietary supplement is a products (other than tobacco) that is intended to supplement the diet and that bears or contains one or more of the following dietary ingredients: a vitamin, a mineral, an herb or other botanical, an amino acid, a dietary substance for use by man to supplement the diet by increasing the total daily intake, or a concentrate, metabolite, constituent, extract or combinations of these ingredients.” Furthermore, a dietary supplement is intended for ingestion in pill, capsule, tablet, or liquid form; is not represented for use as a conventional food or as the sole item of a meal or diet; and is labeled as a dietary supplement 25.
Nutraceuticals are a type of dietary supplements that deliver a concentrated form of a biologically active component from a food, presented in a non-food matrix, to enhance health in dosages that exceed those that could be obtained from regular food 1.
A nutraceuticals is a product isolated or purified from foods that is generally sold in medicinal forms not usually associated with food. A nutraceutical is demonstrated to have a physiological benefit or provide protection against chronic diseases” 27.
Functional foods as “foods that, by virtue of the presence of physiologically active components, provide a health benefit beyond basic nutrition” 38.
Functional foods are food products that in scientific studies have been demonstrated to beneficially affect beneficially one or more target functions in the body, beyond adequate nutritional effects, in a way which is relevant to either the state of well-being and health or the reduction of the risk of a disease”36.
About the Author:
Monica Mollica has a Bachelor’s and Master’s degree in Nutrition from the University of Stockholm, Sweden, and is an ISSA Certified Personal Trainer. She works a dietary consultant, health journalist and writer for www.BrinkZone.com, and is also a web designer and videographer.
Monica has admired and been fascinated by muscular and sculptured strong athletic bodies since childhood, and discovered bodybuilding as an young teenager. Realizing the importance of nutrition for maximal results in the gym, she went for a BSc and MSc with a major in Nutrition at the University.
During her years at the University she was a regular contributor to the Swedish bodybuilding magazine BODY, and she has published the book (in Swedish) “Functional Foods for Health and Energy Balance”, and authored several book chapters in Swedish publications.
It was her insatiable thirst for knowledge and scientific research in the area of bodybuilding and health that brought her to the US. She has completed one semester at the PhD-program “Exercise, Nutrition and Preventive Health” at Baylor University Texas, at the department of Health Human Performance and Recreation, and worked as an ISSA certified personal trainer. Today, Monica is sharing her solid experience by doing dietary consultations and writing about topics related to health, fitness, bodybuilding, anti-aging and longevity.
1. Zeisel SH. Regulation of “nutraceuticals”. Science. Sep 17 1999;285(5435):1853-1855.
2. Greene HL, Prior T, Frier HI. Foods, health claims, and the law: comparisons of the United States and Europe. Obes Res. Nov 2001;9 Suppl 4:276S-283S.
3. Agarwal S, Hordvik S, Morar S. Nutritional claims for functional foods and supplements. Toxicology. Apr 3 2006;221(1):44-49.
4. Gorman D. Health Canada’s regulatory initiative regarding foods with health claims. Can J Public Health. Sep-Oct 2002;93(5):325-327.
5. Katan MB, de Roos NM. Public health. Toward evidence-based health claims for foods. Science. Jan 10 2003;299(5604):206-207.
6. Lawrence M, Rayner M. Functional foods and health claims: a public health policy perspective. Public Health Nutr. Jun 1998;1(2):75-82.
7. Leathwood PD, Richardson DP, Strater P, Todd PM, van Trijp HC. Consumer understanding of nutrition and health claims: sources of evidence. Br J Nutr. Sep 2007;98(3):474-484.
8. Madsen C. Functional foods in Europe. International developments in science and health claims. Ann Nutr Metab. 2007;51(3):298-299.
9. Ohama H, Ikeda H, Moriyama H. Health foods and foods with health claims in Japan. Toxicology. Apr 3 2006;221(1):95-111.
10. Turner RE, Degnan FH, Archer DL. Label claims for foods and supplements: a review of the regulations. Nutr Clin Pract. Feb 2005;20(1):21-32.
11. Clydesdale FM. A proposal for the establishment of scientific criteria for health claims for functional foods. Nutr Rev. Dec 1997;55(12):413-422.
12. Pascal G. Functional foods–the future: how to regulate these foods. Nutr Rev. Nov 1996;54(11 Pt 2):S199-201.
13. Dwyer JT. Do functional components in foods have a role in helping to solve current health issues? J Nutr. Nov 2007;137(11 Suppl):2489S-2492S.
14. Arai S. Global view on functional foods: Asian perspectives. Br J Nutr. Nov 2002;88 Suppl 2:S139-143.
15. Shimizu T. Newly established regulation in Japan: foods with health claims. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2002;11(2):S94-96.
16. Shimizu T. Health claims on functional foods: the Japanese regulations and international comparision. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2003;16:241-252.
17. Glinsmann WH. Functional foods in North America. Nutr Rev. Nov 1996;54(11 Pt 2):S33-37.
18. Hasler CM. Functional foods: the western perspective. Nutr Rev. Nov 1996;54(11 Pt 2):S6-10.
19. Ross S. Functional foods: the Food and Drug Administration perspective. Am J Clin Nutr. Jun 2000;71(6 Suppl):1735S-1738S; discussion 1739S-1742S.
20. Gibson GR, Williams CM. Functional Foods: Concept to Product. 1st ed: CRC; 2000.
21. Heasman M, Mellentin J. The Functional Foods Revolution: Healthy People, Healthy Profits? Earthscan Publications Ltd.; 2001.
22. Schmidl MK, Labuza TP. Essentials Of Functional Foods. 1st ed: Springer; 2000.
23. Hasler CM. Regulation of Functional Foods and Nutraceuticals: A Global Perspective. 1st ed: Wiley-Blackwell; 2005.
24. Wieckowski M. Functional Foods for Halsa och Energibalans: Studentlitteratur; 2005.
25. DSHEA. Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act. In: 103-417 PL, ed; 1994.
26. Wildman REC. Handbook of Nutraceuticals and Functional Foods. 2nd ed: CRC; 2006.
27. Health Canada. Nutraceuticals/Functional Foods and Health Claims On Foods 1988.
28. Richardson DP, Affertsholt T, Asp NG, et al. PASSCLAIM – Synthesis and review of existing processes. Eur J Nutr. Mar 2003;42 Suppl 1:I96-111.
29. Saito M. [Current situation and future perspective in FOSHU (foods for specified health uses)]. Shokuhin Eiseigaku Zasshi. Oct 2005;46(5):J289-291.
30. Tokunaga T. [A present situation of Foods for Specified Health Use (FOSHU) in Japan]. Nippon Yakurigaku Zasshi. Oct 1997;110 Suppl 1:17P-22P.
31. Matirosyan DM. Functional Foods for Chronic Diseases: D and A, Inc.; 2006.
32. Halsted CH. Dietary supplements and functional foods: 2 sides of a coin? Am J Clin Nutr. Apr 2003;77(4 Suppl):1001S-1007S.
33. Arai S. Studies on functional foods in Japan–state of the art. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. Jan 1996;60(1):9-15.
34. Saito M. Role of FOSHU (food for specified health uses) for healthier life. Yakugaku Zasshi. Mar 2007;127(3):407-416.
35. Bellisle R, Diplock AT, Hornstra G. Functional food science in Europe. Br J Nutr. Aug 1998;80 Suppl 1:S3-193.
36. Diplock AT, Aggott PJ, Ashwell M. Scientific Concepts of functional foods in Europe: consensus document. Br J Nutr. Aug 1999;81 Suppl 1:S1-27.
37. Thomas PR, Earl R. Opportunities in the Nutrition and Food Sciences: Research Challenges and the Next Generation of Investigators: National Academy Press; 1994.
38. International Life Sciences Institue. Safety assessment and potential health benefits of food components based on selected scientific criteria. ILSI North America Technical Committee on Food Components for Health Promotion. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 1999;39:203-316.
39. American Dietetic Association. Position of the American Dietetic Association: functional foods. J Am Diet Assoc. 1999;99:1278-1285.
40. Betz JM. A Perspective on Nutraceuticals/Functional Foods: Institute of Food Technologist (IFT); 2001.